top of page
Image by Alexander Grey
  • Hilary Sumner
  • Dec 23, 2025
  • 2 min read


Every week I get at least one client inquiry related to a trademark scam. Knowing how to distinguish legitimate USPTO communications from fraudulent ones can save your business time, money, and significant frustration.


How the Scam Typically Works:


A trademark scam usually begins with an urgent call, email, or text message directed to you or someone in your organization. The sender claims to be from the USPTO and insists immediate action is required.


Common tactics include:


  • Stating that your trademark application or registration will be approved as soon as payment is made

  • Warning that your trademark is about to expire unless you pay immediately

  • Claiming that a third party has applied for your trademark and you must act quickly to prevent losing it


To make the message appear legitimate, scammers often use official-looking details such as the USPTO seal or logo, the name of a real USPTO employee, and even a phone number that appears authentic on caller ID. Despite these convincing elements, these communications are scams.


How to Protect Your Business


Share the following guidance with your staff to reduce the risk of falling victim to trademark-related fraud:


  • Do not pay fees in response to unsolicited demands: The USPTO does not contact applicants or registrants by phone, email, or text to demand immediate payment. While legitimate fees are required for filing, maintaining, and renewing trademarks, the USPTO only collects them at specific stages through its official payment systems. Requests for payment by credit card, wire transfer, payment apps, or gift cards are clear red flags.


  • Slow down and verify: Scammers rely on urgency to pressure recipients into acting without thinking. Take a moment to pause and independently verify any claims. You can check the status of your trademark directly through the USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system.


  • Go directly to trusted sources: For accurate information about your trademark application or registration, contact the USPTO’s Trademark Assistance Center by phone or visit the official USPTO website by typing the address directly into your browser. Do not rely on information supplied in the suspicious communications as scammers can spoof caller ID and create highly realistic (but fake) websites. Never click links or scan QR codes sent via unsolicited emails or text messages, as these may route you straight to fraudsters.


Final Thoughts:


Trademark scams are designed to look official and to catch businesses off guard. A healthy level of skepticism, combined with verification through official USPTO channels, is your best defense. Educating your team about these schemes can help ensure that your intellectual property and your finances remain protected.

 
 
 

I often have clients come to me after receiving an unexpected cease and desist letter demanding the take down of copyrighted content and the payment of damages. Many believe that if an image can be found on the internet it is free to use. Others go a step further and pay for a license but they purchase an individual license rather than a commercial one and then use it in a commercial application.


A recent Supreme Court ruling has expanded the window for copyright damages, allowing owners to seek compensation dating back to the very start of unauthorized use—not just the last three years. This shift raises the stakes for businesses and individuals who may have old, unlicensed photos, music, or other content posted online, since copyright trolls can now target years of past infringement. The safest move? Audit your website and remove anything you don’t clearly own or have rights to. While defendants can still argue statute of limitations based on when infringement should have been discovered, the trend favors broader liability—making proactive cleanup more important than ever.


 
 
 
  • Hilary Sumner
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1 min read

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a dramatic overhaul of the U.S. patent system by replacing flat maintenance fees with an annual “property tax” of 1–5% on patent value, according to The Wall Street Journal. The proposal, led by Commerce Department officials, could sharply raise costs for many patent holders and would make the U.S. an outlier among major economies. While some argue that value-based fees could benefit patents with little or no worth, critics warn the change would likely come on top of existing fees, hitting industries like biotech especially hard—as reflected in recent market declines. CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE

 
 
 
SUMNER IP LAW PLLC
336 Cumberland Street
Lebanon, PA 17042
  • Facebook
FullLogo_NoBuffer.jpeg
  • LinkedIn
Ph:      717.202.5528
Fax:    717.740.2020
Email: hilary@sumneriplaw.com
bottom of page