|Posted on February 2, 2019 at 11:45 AM||comments (0)|
The United States has charged tech company Huawei with trade secret theft, wire fraud, and obstruction of justice. The DOJ alleges that the company took photos and measurements of a phone-testing robot and used that information to build a similar device. Huawei denied the theft, claiming it was the work of miscreants; however, recent emails offering bonuses to employees stealing information from competitors was recently uncovered.
|Posted on September 4, 2018 at 9:15 AM||comments (0)|
A Chinese American Scientist working in Phildelphia admitted to being involved in a plot to steal GlaxoSmithKline trade secrets for China. The trade secrets involved medical treatments for cancer and other illnesses. CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE
|Posted on December 20, 2016 at 3:25 PM||comments (0)|
Written by: Hilary J. Sumner, Esq.
What is DTSA? The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was signed into law on May 11th, 2016. This law creates the first federal civil remedy to address the misappropriation of trade secrets. Prior to the enactment of this law, civil trade secret actions were governed primarily by individual state unfair competition laws. These conflicting laws led to varying standards of protection and remedies to injured parties and non-uniformity created uncertainty as to best means to protect and defend trade secrets in interstate commerce.
The DTSA provides a robust and uniform protection for any trade secret that is related to a product or service used or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce. It gives US district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions involving trade secret misappropriation, allowing the granting of an injunction, damages for actual loss, unjust enrichment and reasonable royalties. If the plaintiff successfully demonstrates that the misappropriation was willful or malicious, exemplary damages as well as reasonable attorney’s fees may also be awarded; but protections are offered to the defendant as well. If the defending party can demonstrate that a claim of misappropriation was made in bad faith, reasonable attorney’s fees may be awarded to the defense.
What qualifies as a Trade Secret? The certainty provided by this new legislation has prompted many companies to revisit their intellectual property profiles. Unlike patents, trade secrets do not need to be technical in nature to be deserving of protection nor do they need to be new, useful or non-obvious. A trade secret must only confer some economic benefit to the owner. That economic benefit cannot be derived from the information itself but from the fact that the information is not known to others.
In order to qualify for protection, the trade secret owner must take reasonable steps to keep that information a secret. The information cannot be generally known to the public or to others in the same industry or business. Customer lists, recipes, special manufacturing processes, marketing plans, and sales methods are all examples of items that may be protected by trade secret law. Coca-Cola provides a prime example of the power of a trade secret, holding their recipe in confidence since 1903. Unlike patent protection, trade secret protection can last indefinitely so long as the information remains undisclosed. It is important to note that a competitor is free to ascertain the trade secret through any lawful means including reverse engineering.
What is the Best Method for Protecting Trade Secrets? Companies should periodically audit their intellectual property portfolio and determine what qualifies as a trade secret. Once a trade secret has been identified, it should be recorded in a trade secret asset management system that will track and identify the appropriate level of protection needed for each trade secret. This system should also identify the person(s) in the organization responsible for safeguarding each trade secret. A policy should be created to periodically review each trade secret and the steps being taken to limit access and prevent unintentional disclosures. All employees with knowledge of the trade secret(s) should be trained in the proper disclosure and safeguarding and access to this information should be limited to those with a genuine need to know.
Contracts Involving Trade Secrets: Contracts involving trade secrets must also be reviewed. The DTSA provides immunity to employees reporting a suspected violation of law. Employers are required to provide notice of this immunity in any employee agreement governing the use of a trade secret or confidential information. Failure to include this immunity provision may result in the loss of exemplary damages and attorney’s fees.
Trade secrets have always provided a robust means of long term protection for intellectual property and the certainty of this protection will only increase with the introduction of DTSA. Those with trade secrets should take the necessary steps to make the most of this new legislation.
|Posted on May 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM||comments (0)|
Obama has signed the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) into law. This law amends the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, creating a federal civil remedy for the misappropriation of trade secrets. It also provides an additional means of protection for intellectual property. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2016/05/obama-signs-federal-trade-secret-bill-into-law/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE FOR ARTICLE
|Posted on November 20, 2014 at 10:20 AM||comments (0)|
A Canadian business called the Hyperstealth Technology Company has recently revealed their "quantum stealth" technology. Camouflage with this detail is extraordinary and the company has elected to hold this invention as a trade secret rather than patent it. It is not surprising that such a revolutionary invention would be held as a trade secret; a patent would allow the company to capitalize on its work only for a designated period of time while a trade secret can be held indefinitely. CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE
|Posted on May 12, 2014 at 7:55 PM||comments (0)|
U.S. Senate recently introduced the Defend Trade Secrets Act. If passed as written, this law would provide new statutory remedies for trade secret protection, a means for the immediate seizure of misappopriated material, and specific damage awards for the loss of trade secrets. Such awards could include attorney’s fees and punitive damages.
|Posted on January 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM||comments (0)|
On December 28th, President Obama signed the Theft of Trade Secrets Act into law (18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-39). This act amends the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) and grants federal courts much broader jurisdiction over trade secret misappropriation cases. In the past, state laws governed trade secret protection and federal jusridiction was only granted in cases where the trade secret misappropriation involved a product that the company used or sold in interstate or foreign commerce. Items used internally within a company did not fall within federal jurisdiction. The current law expands federal jurisdiction, allowing oversight in trade secret cases involving “a product or service used in or intended for use” in commerce.
|Posted on August 20, 2011 at 5:10 PM||comments (0)|
Two recent trade secret decisions held that products and processes comprised of a combination of components qualify for trade secret protection even if the individual components are in the public domain. Trade secret protection may be available if the combination of these elements is not readily known or easily ascertainable.
|Posted on July 6, 2011 at 12:40 AM||comments (0)|
The International Trade Commission (ITC) is a valuable resource in preventing the importation of counterfeit goods. While the ITC cannot award damages, they can issue exclusion orders that will keep infringing products out of the United States. These orders are generally much easier to obtain than court ordered injunctions.